• About me

The Library of Tomorrow

~ thoughts and reflections on the world of Library and Information Science

The Library of Tomorrow

Tag Archives: LibraryThing

#citymash: a report on a library and technology unconference at City University London

14 Sunday Jun 2015

Posted by Dominic in Information Technology

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Analogue Internet, Andrew Preater, City University London, citymash, Daniel van Strien, event reports, fan studies, folksonomy, FOSS, grounded theory, Imperial College London, information architecture, information behaviour, information futurology, information history, information organisation, information technology, James Atkinson, Karine Larose, Kuali Ole, Library Management Systems, library OPACs, LibraryThing, Ludi Price, Markdown, markup languages, Memex, Mundaneum, Pandoc, Paul Otlet, School of Oriental and African Studies, Simon Barron, text filetypes, typography, user experience, Vannevar Bush

Yesterday I attended the inaugural #citymash, a “Mashed Library unconference event” on various issues associated with libraries and technology at City University London. The event took place over a full day, with five slots featuring a choice of lectures, demonstrations and discussion sessions. I enjoyed the day immensely, and I feel that I gained new knowledge from each session that I attended. Perhaps what was most impressive was that some of them were led by my Library or Information Science coursemates, in addition to research students, academics and professional librarians. What follows is a brief review of each of the sessions that I attended.


UX for the WIN! (Andrew Preater and Karine Larose) Andrew and Karine, who both work at Imperial College London, gave a presentation on an ongoing project to improve the user experience (UX) of their library’s Online Public Access Catalogue (OPAC).  Imperial uses Primo, a widely-adopted discovery tool produced by Ex Libris, a company that specialises in library technology.  For this project, they conducted interviews of a sample of Imperial students, and used the principles of grounded theory to undertake open coding of the transcipts (supported by video recordings and screen captures of user interaction with the catalogue), in order to identify underlying and pertinent themes. The results of the research have indicated (unsurprisingly) that students prefer a library catalogue searching experience that is as quick and as “painless” (for example, that typographical errors are recognised and corrected, instead of returning no results) as possible, and that users prioritise information when selecting results from a multitude of options. The library team at Imperial are therefore redeveloping their OPAC over the summer to include an auto-complete function within the search bar, and to simplify its overall presentation. In the second half of the session, we were given the opportunity to put what we had been told into practice ourselves by listening to two of the student interviews and attempting our own open coding of their responses.  For me, what emerged was that although the two students selected were extremely different in many ways in terms of an overall search strategy, their underlying information needs remained the same, and accommodating a wide range of user preferences whilst retaining a simple, elegant front-end design must be a major challenge for any systems librarian.

Further resources:

  • “UX for the win!” at #CityMash: how we did open coding of qualitative research data—Andrew goes into detail about the research methodology of grounded theory.

"UX for the win!" at #CityMash: how we did grounded theory coding of qualitative research data from Andrew Preater

Using Markdown and plain text (Daniel van Strien) For the second session of the event, my coursemate Daniel van Strien gave a presentation on text file formats—proprietary, plain and FOSS (free and open-source software). In day-to-day life, most people (including librarians) will probably use a proprietary file type such as a Microsoft Word document (doc) for word processing and text entry. The problem with these is that they are heavily encoded, and that the nature of the encoding tends to be altered with each new release of Microsoft Office, giving rise to the unwelcome situation whereby a old Word file that has not been opened for many years will become unopenable, as the encoding used to display it correctly rapidly becomes incompatible with later versions of the same programme. This problem can be avoided using plain text within an application such as Notepad, but then the text cannot be formatted at all, making it unsuitable for all but the most basic of uses. Forms of text encoding which are directly visible to the user, such as HTML and LaTeX, are more open to advanced typesetting and formatting, but are often too complicated for quick, general use. Daniel argued that we need documents that are sustainable, portable, translatable, human-readable, and gives the user version control, before presenting Markdown, developed by John Gruber with assistance from Aaron Swartz, as a potential solution. Markdown is a syntax for formatting plain text and also a software tool that automatically converts the formatted plain text into HTML, as the Dillinger Markdown online editor demonstrates. It is relatively simple to learn, yet allows for a range of formatting and typesetting options. When combined with a powerful conversion tool such as Pandoc, this allows the Markdown text file to be automatically converted into a huge variety of formats, including doc, pdf, epub, and LaTeX, potentially saving the time of people such as academic journal editors, who often receive submitted articles in one format and have to convert them manually into another. This session was particularly interesting to me as it highlighted a potential area of technical librarianship of which I was previously unaware. Further resources:

  • Using Markdown and plain text—Daniel’s notes on his presentation

What about the Future? (James Atkinson) My third session of the day saw James Atkinson, another coursemate (and colleague at City University’s library), deliver a presentation on the futurology of the book and of libraries in general. As he covered such topics as Paul Otlet and the Memex, I even had a slight feeling of déjà-vu! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hSyfZkVgasI Aside from a slightly different perspective on some familiar topics, James also went further back in time to discuss “The Victorian Walkman”, sharing a number of contemporary suggestions (many of them quite humorous) for what the recently-invented phonograph would be used for in the far-off days of the twentieth century. Going back further still, it is worth remembering that the book itself (codex) was also once a new technology that replaced the previous scroll format. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pQHX-SjgQvQ For me, the highlight of the session was our division into groups to discuss our own thoughts on what could happen to libraries and information provision in the future. This produced a variety of stimulating responses, although many of them did tend towards the stranger areas of dystopian science-fiction! https://twitter.com/rddave/status/609722231812411392


Open-source implementation (Simon Barron) My choice for fourth session of the day was hosted by Simon Barron, an Analyst Programmer for the SOAS Library, which has recently made waves in the LIS world by becoming only the third university in the world (and the first in the United Kingdom) to implement an open-source Library Management System (LMS): Kuali OLE (Open Library Environment). He gave a detailed overview of how the system had been implemented, followed by the adrenaline-fuelled thrill of a live demo (as he joked on a number of occasions, “what could possibly go wrong?”). As the appearance system’s front-end OPAC implies, Kuali OLE has the same functionality as any proprietary LMS, but without the cost. Simon made the point, however, that choosing an open-source system was not due to cost savings, as the money saved was reinvested in hiring highly-skilled IT staff who could implement it well. I must admit that, with my arts and humanities background, most of the technical material in this session went over my head, but it was interesting to see the back-end of a LMS, going beyond the parts which I normally have access to as a library employee.


NSFW: Fanworks in the library (Ludi Price) My #citymash experience ended with a talk by City University PhD student, Ludi Price, on the information behaviour of fan communities, and how the lessons learned from researching these communities could influence library practices. She showed us fan-fiction websites such as Archive of Our Own to indicate that the dedicated fans of books, films, TV shows, games and so on who write their own creative works in the “universe” of the original are extremely organised, using highly granular levels of category to create a folksonomy—a collaborative creation and maintenance of tags to categorise content. Moreover, repositories of fan fiction habitually display statistics indicating how many times a particular work has been read, downloaded, voted on etc.—the equivalent of a library catalogue publicly displaying its circulation statistics for each item, and allowing users to rate and comment on every bibliographic record. Indeed, many public libraries now feature ratings, recommendations and reviews in their own catalogue records, and the “world’s largest book club”, LibraryThing is a social media platform based on the same principles.


As should be clear from these summaries, the sessions were diverse in nature, covering technical, historical, social and conceptual themes. The other sessions that took place during the event were as follows:

  • Collect and Archive Twitter Data (Ernesto Priego)
  • Open Refine (Owen Stephens)
  • Death and burlesque (Matt Finch)
  • The 3D printing lab at the Bodleian (Oliver Bridle)
  • So you want to be a systems librarian? (Binni Brynolf)
  • Setting up and managing RSS feeds (Paul Pedley)
  • Storytelling, interactive fiction & games (Gary Green)—blog post
  • The Maker Cart (Carlos Iszak)

Evolve or die

22 Sunday Mar 2015

Posted by Dominic in Information Society

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Amazon, Dan Franklin, disruptive innovation, Google Scholar, information society, LAPIS, LibraryThing, Michael Cairns, Penguin Random House

My earlier blog posts on copyright, the serials crisis and Open Access may have give the impression that large commercial publishers are the natural antagonists of librarians; that librarians are the heroic, under-resourced champions of access to information that would otherwise be locked and bound behind a labyrinthine network of paywalls, copyright law and restricted permissions. This is, of course, largely untrue: the researcher, the publisher and the librarian are all integral parts of the information communication chain and are therefore in a symbiotic relationship with each other, even if one group’s needs and goals have the potential to cause tension with those of another. It is important to bear in mind that innovations such as Creative Commons licenses and Open Access publishing are not completely revolutionary, as they merely form a legal superstructure on an existing foundation in the case of the former and shift the payment structure within the existing publishing framework on the other. And whilst librarians may face financial problems caused by the high price of subscriptions to academic journals, it must also be remembered that the publishers themselves are facing huge challenges for a variety of reasons. These include technological developments in how books are published and read—most obviously the ascendancy of the e-book—business-model challenges from internet giants such as Google Scholar’s digitisation programme and Amazon’s print-on-demand service, and societal changes in what is being read (witness the popularity of the Fifty Shades of Grey series, which was originally written as fan-fiction).

Our most recent LAPIS lecture covered the current situation from the publisher’s point-of-view, and included the pertinent observation by Michael Cairns of Publishing Technology that:

Technology in publishing, how it is implemented and how it is used is increasingly the differentiator—not the content!—between the publishers that will succeed and those that will fail.

In other words, publishers must stay on top of the latest technological developments, or they will go out of business: evolve or die. In practical terms, this process has extended from the automation of backroom publishing (already largely completed, from computerised typesetting through to algorithmically-driven distribution), through the digitision of content, to the increasing personalisation of marketing and user-centred material through analytics programmes such as this soon-to-be released service offered to publishers by Jellyfish, described in terms that cover the current data mining zeitgeist, as “Google Analytics for e-books”.

To reinforce the plethora of possibilities being pursued by publishers at present, we also had a guest lecture from Dan Franklin, the Digital Publisher at Penguin Random House UK, the British section of a global conglomerate formed recently by the merger of the two historic publishing houses in 2013. He emphasised that, as the digital publishing industry reaches a stable state of maturity (to the point at which the very term becomes a tautology, as publishers now include it within their overall publishing strategy in all forms of media), it is important for publishers to fully interact with the new and constantly-evolving technology available in order to maximise readership, which both increases information consumption (and therefore, hopefully, knowledge) and the companies’ commercial viability in an era which has been influenced hugely by the expectation of free content engendered by the development and growth of the Internet. He also picked out the music and entertainment industry, which has a long history of resisting change for fear of losing revenue, only to suffer in the longer-term as a result.

Franklin also took us on a whistle-stop tour of some of Penguin Random House’s current digital projects, including YourFry, a digital storytelling project to create a crowdsourced biography based on the memoirs of Stephen Fry; new e-reading websites for Penguin’s Pelican and Little Black Classics imprints; the use of other forms of media such as podcasts and films to attract new readers; technological changes such as the creation of a template for building recipe e-book apps; and the use of social media websites such as My Independent Bookshop to improve the user-centred, personalised experience for consumers. The message is clear, and also applicable to libraries (for example, the website LibraryThing is a clear parallel to My Independent Bookshop): innovate or become irrelevant.

[N.B. The cover image for this post is by Ben Tubby (flickr.com) CC BY 2.0, via Wikimedia Commons.]

#citylis blogs

  • CityLIS blog
  • David Bawden
  • Ernesto Priego
  • Ludi Price
  • Lyn Robinson

Posts by category

  • General (5)
  • Information Architecture (9)
  • Information History (3)
  • Information Management (1)
  • Information Organisation (1)
  • Information Society (12)
  • Information Technology (1)
  • Information Theory (2)

Follow me on Twitter

My Tweets

Common Tags

Altmetric altmetrics Analogue Internet application programming interfaces authority control BIBFRAME Big Data censorship Charles Ammi Cutter City University London Creative Commons databases data manipulation data mining datasets data visualisation digital divide Digital Humanities disruptive innovation DITA Ernesto Priego event reports Fun Palaces Google Google Scholar Henri La Fontaine housekeeping information architecture information behaviour information futurology information history information law information management information needs information organisation information overload information retrieval information society information technology information theory JSON LAPIS Lawrence Lessig Library education library OPACs Library qualifications Library school LibraryThing MARC markup languages Matt Finch Memex metadata Mundaneum museums Old Bailey Online Open Access Paul Otlet programming languages public libraries search engines Semantic Web social media TAGS text analysis Twitter Universal Decimal Classification user experience Vannevar Bush Voyant Tools Web 2.0 website design Wikipedia WordPress XML

#citylis student blogs

  • Ali
  • Alison
  • Amy
  • Caitlin
  • Cathy
  • Chris
  • Clyden
  • Daniel
  • David
  • Eleanor
  • Elena
  • Emma
  • Eve
  • Fengchun
  • Gordon
  • Hannah
  • Hannie
  • Harkiran
  • Ian
  • Iro
  • Isobel
  • James
  • Jamilah
  • Joanna
  • Judith
  • Julie
  • Kathryn
  • Kristina
  • Lamar
  • Lisa
  • Maryam
  • Matthew
  • Melissa
  • Naama
  • Neil
  • Nicole
  • Pablo
  • Rachel
  • Richard
  • Russell
  • Saidah
  • Sal
  • Sarah B.
  • Sarah R.
  • Scott
  • Shermaine
  • Steve
  • Tom
  • Wendy
  • Yee Xin

Blog archives

Blog Stats

  • 10,410 hits

Recent Comments

Anime roundup 6/29/2… on A Demon of the Second Kind: St…
A voyage of Discover… on Anticipating the dissertation:…
Serendipity and zine… on If you go down to the library…
Visiting the Mundane… on Reductio ad Wikipedia?
Visiting the Mundane… on Anticipating the dissertation:…

Copyright

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The cover image (Orion Nebula) was taken by NASA/ESA, and is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons.

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

Privacy & Cookies: This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this website, you agree to their use.
To find out more, including how to control cookies, see here: Cookie Policy